نوع مقاله : علمی - پژوهشی
عنوان مقاله English
نویسندگان English
Whipping punishment has been used throughout history in response to crime and has faced many objections and criticisms. Some jurists consider this punishment to be against human dignity and dignity, violating human rights, ineffective, and causing the escalation of violence and individual and social deviations. On the other hand, the supporters of whipping from a religious and legal point of view consider whipping to be in accordance with Shari'a rules, in accordance with public order, effective and expedient. Considering that whipping is one of the punishments that is implemented in Iran and this punishment has been criticized by international institutions, it is necessary to analyze and evaluate the whipping of criminals from different angles, especially from the criminological, psychological and sociological point of view. Using the descriptive-analytical method and using library resources, this article tries to answer the question that to what extent whipping is effective and consistent with the philosophy of punishment? And what are the reasons for the supporters and opponents of flogging? This research first examines the history and basics of whipping punishment, then by analyzing the effects and consequences of whipping punishment on individuals and society, it tries to arrive at the hypothesis that whipping punishment cannot be effective in reforming and rehabilitating criminals, and in general, everything derived from the new approach of punishment philosophy It is not proven in the application of whipping punishment.
کلیدواژهها English